MANILA, Philippines — Vice President Sara Duterte on Tuesday once again backtracked on her threat of having President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. killed, saying it is “a plan without flesh.”
Duterte made the statement after Malacañang tagged her previous remarks of having hired someone to kill Marcos, his wife Liza, and cousin House Speaker Martin Romualdez as an “active threat.”
Article continues after this advertisementREAD: Sara Duterte’s kill remark vs Marcos is ‘active threat’ – Palace
FEATURED STORIES NEWSINFO VP Sara fires back, tags Marcoses in Ninoy assassination NEWSINFO Security officer picked by VP Duterte disbursed confidential funds NEWSINFO DOJ to Dela Rosa, VP Duterte: No such thing as ‘conditional threat’“Common sense should be enough for us to understand and accept that a supposed conditional act of revenge does not constitute an active threat. This is a plan without a flesh,” her statement reads.
“I am confident that an honest scrutiny would easily expose this narrative to be farce, imagined, or nothing at all,” she added.
Article continues after this advertisementAccording to Duterte, Marcos and “his sycophants” are merely “aggressively” pushing a narrative that she maintains to have been taken out of logical context.
Article continues after this advertisement“The diametric contrast and inaction are displayed when I have expressed in previous months threats to my person and continuing threats to the life of OVP personnel,” she added.
Article continues after this advertisementShe also lambasted the Marcos administration’s use of the word “assassin,” pointing out that she never used the term in her statement.
After her threat against Marcos last Saturday, the National Bureau of Investigation said it is set to issue a subpoena to the Vice President to have her explain her side as the agency investigates the supposed murder plot.
Article continues after this advertisementREAD: BI to issue subpoena to VP Duterte over threats vs President Marcos
Meanwhile, the Department of Justice said Duterte’s threat against Marcos showed her “lack of recourse to legal and judicial remedies,” which “exposes” her to criminal liabilities.
Subscribe to our daily newsletter